Glantz v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
837 F.2d 23 · 1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2019
2 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1985 · 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez · Frank v. Mangum · Sealfon v. United States · Emich Motors Corporation v. General Motors Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“precludes raising issues in a civil case already decided in a prior criminal trial”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is well established that a prior criminal conviction may work an estoppel in favor of the Government in a subsequent civil proceeding.... Such estoppel extends only to questions “distinctly put in issue and directly determined” in the criminal prosecution_ In the case of a criminal conviction based on a jury verdict of guilty, issues which were essential to the verdict must be regarded as having been determined by the judgment....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.