Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 837 F.2d 272 - Hall v. Bowen

Hall v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

837 F.2d 272 · 1988

Citation profile

170
cited by 170 later decisions
June 2025
most recently cited

63 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 170 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Trimiar v. Sullivan (1992), Barker v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1989)

63 federal appellate · 3 district ·

75019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 1 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Kirk v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Duncan v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Allen v. Califano · King v. Heckler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 170 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he decision [of whether work exists in significant numbers] should ultimately be left to the trial judge's common sense in weighing the statutory language as applied to a particular claimant's factual situation.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “when good reasons are identified for not accepting them.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “it is immaterial that [the number of relevant jobs] is a small percentage of the total number of jobs in a given area.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.