Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 837 F.2d 45 - Marino v. Ameruso

Marino v. Ameruso’s Empirical Analysis

837 F.2d 45 · 1988

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Hellenic American Neighborhood Action Committee v. City of New York (1996), Maintenance Co., Inc. v. Goldin (1988)

14 federal appellate · 2 district ·

2201988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Parratt v. Taylor · Daniels v. Williams · Hudson v. Palmer · Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although one need not exhaust state remedies before bringing a Section 1983 action claiming a violation of procedural due process, one must nevertheless prove as an element of that claim that state procedural remedies are inadequate.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he Supreme Court has clearly distinguished between a claim that an established state procedure does not afford procedural due process and a claim that a property right was lost because of a random and unauthorized act by a state actor. In the latter case, the existence of an adequate postdeprivation state remedy for the loss affords due process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.