Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 837 F.2d 623 - Berry v. Curreri

Berry v. Curreri’s Empirical Analysis

837 F.2d 623 · 1988

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2014

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. · Dimick v. Schiedt · Saludes v. Ramos · 647 F. Supp. 781 - Boyd v. Bulala · 573 F. Supp. 1101 - Quinones v. Charles Harwood Memorial Hospital

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No action against a health care provider may be commenced in court before the claimant’s proposed complaint has been filed with the Committee and the Committee has received the expert opinion as required by this section, provided, that if said opinion is not received by the Committee within ninety days from the date the complaint was filed with the Committee, the claimant may commence his action against the health care provider in court; Provided further, That the commencement of the court action shall not prevent the Committee from obtaining the expert opinion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is designed to eliminate claims lacking merit and encourage prompt settlement of meritorious claims.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “shall be to arrange for expert review of all malpractice claims before actions based upon such claims are commenced in Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.