Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 837 F.2d 84 - United States v. Haller

United States v. Haller’s Empirical Analysis

837 F.2d 84 · 1988

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably United States v. Amodeo (1995), United States v. Corbitt (1989)

28 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

2801988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 501

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Brady v. United States · Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia · United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. · Press-Enterprise Company v. Superior Court of California Riverside County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “capable of repetition yet evading review,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “regarding his knowledge of criminal activity having to do with labor organization officers or employees in conjunction with employment practices at the Nine Mile Two Nuclear Power Plant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[p]lea hearings have typically been open to the public, and such access ... serves to allow public scrutiny of the conduct of courts and prosecutors”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.