Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 837 F.3d 571 - Delgado v. Osuna

Delgado v. Osuna’s Empirical Analysis

837 F.3d 571 · 2016

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
September 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Larbie v. Larbie · Hurst v. Florida · Berezowsky v. Ojeda

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) that [Riascos] removed or retained the child somewhere other than the child’s habitual residence; (2) that the removal or retention violated [Jaimes’s] rights of custody und¿r the habitual-residence nation’s laws; and (3) that at the time of removal or retention, [Jaimes] was exercising those rights or would have exercised those rights but for the removal or retention. 6”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.