Ghiselli v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis
837 F.3d 771 · 2016
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Craft v. Astrue · Briscoe ex rel. Taylor v. Barnhart · Bjornson v. Astrue · Villano v. Astrue · Wilder v. Chater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... a treating physician's medical opinion is entitled to controlling weight in the disability analysis if it is well supported by objective medical evidence and is consistent with other substantial evidence in the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Persisting in looking for employment even while claiming to suffer from a painful disability might simply indicate a strong work ethic or overly-optimistic outlook rather than an exaggerated condition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.