837 F. Supp. 834 - Blake v. Cisneros’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1703 · 18 U.S.C. § 1621 · 26 U.S.C. § 6402 · 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 31 U.S.C. § 3720A
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Califano v. Sanders · United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“married couples would be unable to secure financing based on their joint resources, as every lender would predicate every marital loan on the ability of each party to individually service the debt in case of divorce. As such a result would wreak unnecessary hardship on most marriages, justice requires that HUD retain its ability to collect the debt____”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.