Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 837 NE2D 167 - Eppler v. Eppler

Eppler v. Eppler’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dunson v. Dunson · MacLafferty v. MacLafferty · Carr v. Carr · Snow v. Rincker · Neudecker v. Neudecker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Development of these Guidelines did not take into consideration the awarding of the income tax exemption. Instead, it is recommended that each case be reviewed on an individual basis and that a decision be made in the context of each case. Judges and practitioners should be aware that under current law the court cannot award an exemption to a parent, but the court may order a parent to release or sign over the exemption for one or more of the children to the other parent pursuant to I.R.C. s 152(e). . . . Judges may wish to consider ordering the release to be executed on an annual basis, contingent upon support being current at the end of the calendar year for which the exemption is ordered as an additional incentive to keep support payments current. It may also be helpful to specify a date by which the release is to be delivered to the other parent each year. Shifting the exemption for minor children does not alter the filing status of either party. In determining when to order a release of exemptions, it is recommended that at minimum the following factors be considered: (1) the value of the exemption at the marginal tax rate of each parent; (2) the income of each parent; (3) the age of the child(ren) and how long the exemption will be available; (4) the percentage of the cost of supporting the child(ren) borne by each parent; and (5) the financial burden assumed by each parent under the property settlement in the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Generally, the custodial parent automatically receives the dependent tax exemptions for the minor children; however, the custodial parent may execute a written waiver of the exemption for a particular tax year.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Taking into account those factors, a `trial court's equitable discretion should be guided primarily by the goal of making the maximum amount of child support available for the child.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.