Davis v. Knafel’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kirk v. Kirk · MacLafferty v. MacLafferty · Thurman v. Thurman · D.B.M. v. State Ex Rel. A.R. · Bettencourt v. Ford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. at 942 (emphasis supplied). The MacLafferty court declined to hold that a modification could never be made under Subsection (1) where the changed circumstance alleged was a change in one parent's income which would change the child support payment by less than twenty percent:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cooper v. Fazio“There may be situations where a variety of factors converge to make such a modification permissible under the terms of the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cooper v. Fazio
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.