State v. Watkins’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2017
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 80 Ill. App. 3d 552 - People v. Massarella · 53 Ill. 2d 437 - People v. Anderson · Welch v. Union Mutual Insurance Co. of Providence · State v. Kaufman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“remedial or procedural statutes which do not create, enlarge, diminish, or destroy vested rights are generally held to operate retrospectively.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. STATE v. HURT · State v. Salathiel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.