¶1concurring specially.
¶2I concur for the reasons stated in my concurring opinion in Garcia v. State, 736 So.2d 89, 90-91 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
837 So. 2d 1084
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 12, 2003
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-02-12
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2005
1 state decisions
Relies on 736 So. 2d 89 - Garcia v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2003-02-12
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1concurring specially.
¶2I concur for the reasons stated in my concurring opinion in Garcia v. State, 736 So.2d 89, 90-91 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).