837 So. 2d 1114 - Juede v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 446 So. 2d 1038 - Lusk v. State · 832 So. 2d 850 - Carratelli v. State · 795 So. 2d 279 - Martinez v. State · 821 So. 2d 1150 - Rodas v. State · 825 So. 2d 1067 - Scott v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[a] juror's subsequent statements that he or she could be fair should not necessarily control the decision to excuse a juror for cause, when the juror has expressed genuine reservations about his or her preconceived opinions or attitudes.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that's what he is paid to do. They go through special training to notice tattoos, scars.... I would only credit him because of his training and he deals with it more than other people.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the rehabilitation of jurors whose responses in voir dire raise concerns about their impartiality.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.