Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

837 So. 2d 1123

Pohl v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 19, 2003

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-02-19

Decided 2003-02-19

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s convictions of tampering with a witness, contrary to section 914.22(1), Florida Statute (2000), and retaliation against a witness, in violation of section 914.23, Florida Statutes (2000). We reverse appellant’s conviction of harassing a witness under section 914.22(2), Florida Statutes (2000), because there was no evidence that appellant’s contact with the police informant hindered, delayed, prevented, or dissuaded the informant from engaging in any of the conduct specified in section 914.22(2)(a)-(d).

¶2Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

STONE, GROSS and MAY, JJ„ concur.
/837/so2d/1123 · .json · Public domain