Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 837 SO2D 221 - Towner v. State

Towner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Solem v. Helm · McClain v. State · 440 So. 2d 297 - Groseclose v. State · 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is the customary practice, in the name of judicial economy, for an appellate court to affirm the trial court if the right result is reached even though for the wrong reason.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “As a general rule, a sentence that does not exceed the maximum period allowed by statute will not be disturbed on appeal. Wallace v. State, 607 So.2d 1184, 1188 (Miss.1992). Generally, the imposition of a sentence is within the discretion of the trial court, and appellate courts will not review the sentence, if it is within the limits prescribed by statute. Reynolds v. State, 585 So.2d 753, 756 (Miss.1991).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(i) the gravity of the offense and the harshness of the penalty; (ii) the sentences imposed on other criminals in the same jurisdiction; and (iii) the sentences imposed for commission of the same crime in other jurisdictions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.