837 So. 2d 235 - Beard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2005
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 741 So. 2d 894 - McGilberry v. State · 535 So. 2d 1371 - Vickery v. State · 794 So. 2d 181 - Williams v. State · McNeal v. State · 790 So. 2d 856 - Wash v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he sufficiency of the evidence as a matter of law is viewed and tested in a light most favorable to the State. The credible evidence consistent with [the defendant's] guilt must be accepted as true. The prosecution must be given the benefit of all favorable inferences that may be reasonably drawn from the evidence.... We are authorized to reverse only where, with respect to one or more of the elements of the offense charged, the evidence so considered is such that reasonable and fair-minded jurors could only find the accused not guilty.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Harvey v. State · Graham v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.