Snodgrass v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

22 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “LeDuc v. State, 415 So.2d 721, 722 (Fla.1982); State v. Wiita, 744 So.2d 1232, 1234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). This is a more stringent standard than a motion to withdraw a plea filed before sentencing; the burden falls on the defendant to prove that withdrawal is necessary to correct the manifest injustice. See Scott v. State, 629 So.2d 888, 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Id. at 508 (emphasis in original).”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Woodly v. State · Williams v. State

2. “Although rule 3.170( l ) does not expressly require a trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing, we [have held] that due process requires a hearing unless the record conclusively shows the defendant is entitled to no relief.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Williams v. State

3. “as true, except to the extent that they are conclusively rebutted by the record”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 942 So. 2d 1036 - Molina v. State