837 So. 2d 876 - Fincher v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Nunn v. Baker · 831 So. 2d 641 - Ford v. State · 596 So. 2d 16 - Huff v. State · Willingham v. State · 724 So. 2d 87 - Fincher v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘ “A court of general jurisdiction proceeding within the scope of its powers will be presumed to have jurisdiction to give the judgments and decrees it renders until the contrary appears. So, a court of general jurisdiction is presumed to have acted within its powers, and the burden is on the accused affirmatively to show that it had no jurisdiction, unless facts showing want of jurisdiction affirmatively appear on the record.” “‘22 C.J.S. Criminal Law § 174 (1989). “[A] court conducting a criminal proceeding is presumed to have jurisdiction, whether or not there are recitals in its record to show it.” 22A C.J.S. Criminal Law § 702 (1989).’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howard v. State“This Court will not remand a case to the circuit court to hold an evidentiary hearing on a jurisdictional claim that was not presented in the petitioner's Rule 32 petition unless facts appear in the record affirmatively showing a lack of jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Boyd v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.