United States v. Gelfuso’s Empirical Analysis
838 F.2d 358 · 1988
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2021
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3145 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3164 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)
Relies on United States v. Salerno · United States v. Portes · United States v. Claudio · United States v. Accetturo · United States v. Theron
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Like the Second Circuit, we find that the due process limit on the length of pretrial detention requires assessment on a case-by-case basis. United States v. Gonzales-Claudio, 806 F.2d at 340 . We consider the length of confinement in conjunction with the extent to which the prosecution bears responsibility for the delay that has ensued. Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“decide whether, absent the government's lack of responsibility for pretrial delay, preventive detention under the Bail Reform Act of ten months”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.