Weeks v. Quinlan’s Empirical Analysis
838 F.2d 41 · 1988
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently November 2019 · most notably Bf Goodrich Company, New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. Perales (1992)
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 293
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · Morton v. Ruiz · Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'is based on a permissible construction of the statute'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. 737 F. Supp. 212 - United States v. 13.10 Acres of Land in County of Putnam · B.F. Goodrich Company Upjohn Company Dow Corning Corporation Reynold Aluminum Building Products Company Uniroyal Chemical Company, Inc. And Hoechst Celenese Corporation v. Harold Murtha A.C. Hampson Printing A.W. Sandora & Sons Action Refuse Action Moving Co., and Town of Beacon Falls Town of Bethany Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority Town of Hamden Town of Killingworth Town of Middlebury City of Milford City of New Haven Town of Orange Town of Plymouth Town of Seymour Town of Stratford Town of Thomaston City of Waterbury and Town of Westport, Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc. v. Harold Murtha Murtha Trucking, Inc. Murtha Enterprises, Inc., and City of Ansonia Town of Beacon Falls Town of Bethany Town of Killingworth Town of Middlebury Borough of Naugatuck New Haven Housing Authority Town of Orange Town of Plymouth Town of Seymour City of Shelton City of Stamford Town of Stratford Town of Thomaston Town of Watertown Watertown Housing Authority Town of Westport and Town of Woodbury, State of Connecticut v. Harold Murtha Murtha Trucking, Inc. Murtha Enterprises, Inc., United States of America v. Harold Murtha Terrance Murtha Murtha Trucking, Inc., United States of America v. Armstrong Rubber Company Eastern Company Primerica Corporation“(c) A parolee whose release is revoked by the Commission will receive credit on service of his sentence for time spent under supervision, except as provided below: ... (2) It is the Commission’s interpretation of 18 U.S.C. 4210(b)(2) that, if a parolee has been convicted of a new offense committed subsequent to his release on parole, which is punishable by any term of imprisonment, detention, or incarceration in any penal facility, forfeiture of time from the date of such release to the date of execution of the warrant is an automatic statutory penalty, and such time shall not be credited to the service of the sentence. An actual term of confinement or imprisonment need not have been imposed for such conviction; it suffices that the statute under which the parolee was convicted permits the trial court to impose any term of confinement or imprisonment in any penal facility.... However, in no event shall the violator term imposed under this subsection, taken together with the time served before release, exceed the total length of the original sentence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is a well-established principle of administrative law that due weight or deference should be accorded to an agency’s interpretation of a statute that it is charged to administer.”). 6 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.