Fountain v. Karim’s Empirical Analysis
838 F.3d 129 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Relies on Makarova v. United States · Riviello v. Waldron · Velez v. Levy · Zappia Middle East Construction Company Limited v. The Emirate of Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, and Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank · Tandon v. Captain's Cove Marina of Bridgeport, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the district court must take all uncontroverted facts in the complaint ... as true, and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the party asserting jurisdiction.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A case is properly dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) when the district court lacks the statutory or constitutional power to adjudicate it.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A plaintiff asserting subject matter jurisdiction has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that it exists.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.