Didon v. Castillo’s Empirical Analysis
838 F.3d 313 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 9001 · 22 U.S.C. § 9003 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 11601 (International Child Abduction Remedies Act)
Relies on Nken v. Holder · Medellin v. Texas · El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan Tseng · Chan v. Korean Air Lines, Ltd. · Abbott v. Abbott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a it is in breach of rights of custody -attributed to a person ... under the law of the State in which the child is 'habitually resident immediately before the removal or retention; and b at the time of removal or retention those rights were actually exercised ... or would have been so exercised but for the removal or retention.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.