United States v. Mire’s Empirical Analysis
838 F.3d 621 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3613 · 26 U.S.C. § 7424 · 28 U.S.C. § 3002 · 28 U.S.C. § 3205
Relies on United States v. National Bank of Commerce · United States v. Craft · Mustang Pipeline Co. v. Driver Pipeline Co. · Woodard v. General Motors Corp. · Lipscomb v. Fuqua
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“property ... in which the debtor has a substantial nonexempt interest and which is in the possession, custody, or control of a person other than the debtor, in order to satisfy the judgment against the debtor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he government may use the garnishment provisions of the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 3001 - 3308, to collect a restitution obligation imposed by a judgment of conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although federal law thus creates a lien on property, it is state law that 'defines the property interests to which the lien attaches.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.