Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 838 F. Supp. 401 - Futrell v. JI Case

838 F. Supp. 401 - Futrell v. JI Case’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
October 1994
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens · Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Thurston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “has a tendency when the pressure is on to blame other departments. Must learn to function as a team player. Attitude is strained under pressure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “You've got sharp, young people that are delivering a lot of work and you've got older people that aren't delivering as much work.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “such an inference [here], even if permissible, was not reasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.