Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 838 So. 2d 1064 - Duncan v. State

838 So. 2d 1064 - Duncan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · 542 So. 2d 931 - Ex Parte Heaton · Rokitski v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Once the trial court has properly accepted a defendant’s plea, the trial court has sole discretion in determining whether the defendant should be allowed to withdraw the plea. Moreover, any conflicting evidence is not subject to review on appeal unless it is shown that the trial court abused its discretion. Ex parte Heaton, 542 So.2d 931 (Ala.1989).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.