Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

838 So. 2d 1067

Beardslee v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 28, 2001

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 2001-09-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2003

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-09-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SHAW, Judge,

¶1dissenting.

¶2The trial court erred when it permitted the State to amend the indictment to include enhancement under the provisions in §§ 13A-12-250 and 13A-12-270, Ala.Code 1975, because the amendment resulted in Beardslee’s being charged with a greater offense. See Rule 13.5(a), Ala.R.Crim.P.. Therefore, I would reverse the appellant’s conviction and sentence. See my special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, August 31, 2001] — So.2d - (Ala.Crim.App.2001) (Shaw, J., concurring in the result).

/838/so2d/1067 · .json · Public domain