Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

838 So. 2d 1209

N.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-03-05

Decided 2003-03-05

STRINGER, Judge.

¶1We affirm N.S.’s convictions and sentences for burglary of a structure and petit theft; however, we remand for correction of the disposition order.

¶2The State filed a petition for delinquency charging N.S. with burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. As part of a plea agreement with the State, N.S. pleaded no contest to reduced charges of burglary of a structure and petit theft. The trial court accepted N.S.’s plea to the reduced charges; however, the disposition order incorrectly states that N.S. pleaded no contest to the original charges. On remand, the trial court must enter a corrected disposition order that accurately reflects the crimes to which N.S. pleaded.

¶3Affirmed but remanded for correction of the disposition order.

WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ„ Concur.
/838/so2d/1209 · .json · Public domain