838 So. 2d 343 - Pate v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2004
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rummel v. Estelle · 440 So. 2d 297 - Groseclose v. State · 584 So. 2d 786 - Grubb v. State · 532 So. 2d 584 - Doby v. State · Gibson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Trial courts have the discretionary power to limit repetitive cross-examination so as to provide for the orderly presentation of evidence and the elimination of needless waste of time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.