838 So. 2d 485 - Bruno v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 2005
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Chapman v. State of California · Ring v. Arizona · Yates v. Evatt · Sochor v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Striking one aggravating factor when there are no mitigating circumstances does not necessarily require resentencing because, `[i]f there is no likelihood of a different sentence, the error must be deemed harmless.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.