838 So. 2d 529 - Persaud v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the Court does not have jurisdiction to review per curiam decisions of the district courts of appeal that merely affirm with citations to cases not pending review in this Court.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 846 So. 2d 1141 - Gandy v. State · 974 So. 2d 1135 - Mullins v. State

2. “this Court's reasoning and holding in Stallworth , when applied in a manner consistent with our decisions in Dodi Publishing, Jollie, and Florida Star , dictate a similar result here. We therefore hold that we do not have jurisdiction to review per curiam unelaborated denials of relief from the district courts of appeal that, like the decisions in Gandy's, Goodwin's, and Jeffus's cases, merely cite to a case not pending on review in this Court, or to a statute or rule of procedure, and do not contain any discussion of the facts in the case such that it could be said that the district court”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 846 So. 2d 1141 - Gandy v. State

3. “[I]n those cases where the district court has not explicitly identified a conflicting decision, it is necessary for the district court to have included some facts in its decision so that the question of law addressed by the district court in its decision can be discerned by the Court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 846 So. 2d 1141 - Gandy v. State