Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 838 SO2D 626 - Dey v. Dey

Dey v. Dey’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Teta v. Teta · Smith v. Mogelvang · Koken v. Neubauer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]rial court cannot modify a child support provision sua sponte, unless such modification was properly pled and notice was given so that the opposing party has a fair opportunity to respond.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the opposing party had a fair opportunity to defend against the issue and . . . could have offered additional evidence on that issue if it had been pleaded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.