In re S.C.T

Decided January 8, 2003

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2003-01-08

Cited by 134 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 17 So. 3d 927 - In Re Smith (2009), In Re Hatfield (2009)

134 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-01-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2Considering the Petition for Reinstatement to Active Status from Disability Inactive Status filed by respondent, and the response thereto filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

¶3IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition be and hereby is denied.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 22(G)(2), respondent may not reapply for transfer to active status until at least one year from the date of this order. In the event respondent reapplies after becoming eligible to do so, he shall produce competent evidence establishing that the alcohol and. drug problems that caused his disability have been resolved.

/s/ Catherine D. Kimball

¶5Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana