Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 839 A.2d 1237 - DeLuca v. DeLuca

DeLuca v. DeLuca’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on May v. Penn TV & Furniture Co., Inc. · Hoult v. Hoult · United States v. Boch Oldsmobile, Inc. · Inc v. Airco Inc · Nisenzon v. Sadowski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “read into the record an agreement that the parties themselves have reached.” Id. The relatively limited nature of a nominal divorce hearing militates in favor of our holding that the doctrine of res judicata should bar only issues actually litigated in that proceeding. 3 . Section 5 of the property settlement agreement reads in its entirety:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.