Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 839 A2D 356 - Bell v. Kater

Bell v. Kater’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2025

6 state decisions

30200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 129 Pa. Commw. 25 - WEIMAN BY TRAHEY v. Philadelphia · 2003 Pa. Super. 274 - Commonwealth v. Bishop

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) General Rule. On remand of the record the court or other government unit below shall proceed in accordance with the judgment or other order of the appellate court and, except as otherwise provided in such order, Rule 1701(a) (effect of appeals generally) shall no longer be applicable to the matter.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “after an appeal is taken ... the trial court ... may no longer proceed further in the matter”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.