Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 839 F.2d 1009 - Bettius & Sanderson, P.C. v. National Union Fire Insurance

Bettius & Sanderson, P.C. v. National Union Fire Insurance’s Empirical Analysis

839 F.2d 1009 · 1988

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
6
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Power v. Arlington Hospital Ass'n (1994), United States v. Elie (1997)

12 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

2501988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)

Relies on Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. United States · United Const Workers Affiliated with United Mine Workers of America v. Laburnum Const Corp · Kamlar Corp. v. Haley · Wyatt v. Interstate & Ocean Transport Co. · Beck v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is unrealistic to suggest that the corporation is not earning a profit.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “to use the same formula as a commercial corporation if that formula does not accurately or adequately reflect its profits,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “calculate their net incomes with different goals in mind”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.