Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 839 F.2d 1075 - Baker v. Bowen

Baker v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

839 F.2d 1075 · 1988

Citation profile

121
cited by 121 later decisions
June 2019
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 121 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Powers v. Commissioner (1993), Perales v. Casillas (1992)

32 federal appellate · 5 district ·

4801988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Action on Smoking & Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board · Hirschey v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission · McGill v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Sierra Club v. Secretary of the Army · Trichilo v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]xcept in unusual circumstances, ... an increase should be granted.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an increase in the cost of living ... justifies a higher fee”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[In 1996], Congress believed [$125] was a sufficient rate for awards under the Act. By permitting cost-of-living increases, Congress intended to provide attorneys at most with an hourly rate in present-day dollars commensurate with [$125] in [1996].”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.