Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 839 F.2d 1245 - Varnell v. Young

Varnell v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

839 F.2d 1245 · 1988

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
October 2019
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently October 2019

10 federal appellate ·

1901988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Rose v. Lundy · Wallace v. Duckworth · Toney v. Franzen · 132 Wis. 2d 456 - Pettygrove Ex Rel. Scholl v. Pettygrove · Arrowood v. Clusen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘A habeas petitioner has “fairly presented” ’ a claim to a state court if he has clearly informed the state court of the factual basis of the claim and has argued to the state court that those facts constituted a violation of the petitioner’s constitutional rights.’”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “there is either an absence of available State corrective process or the existence of circumstances rendering such process ineffective to protect the rights of the prisoner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “petitioner must establish that the state court was 'fairly alerted' to the constitutional claim that the 'substance' of the ... claim [was] 'fairly presented.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.