Mattox v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis
839 F.2d 1523 · 1988
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1990
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Wainwright v. Sykes · Picard v. Connor · Daugharty v. Gladden · Kirby v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The substance of a federal habeas corpus claim must first be presented to the state courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cummings v. Dugger“[label] his original claims as 'federal' constitutional ones”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cummings v. Dugger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.