John W. McQueen v. J.A. Tabah, W.D. Dixon’s Empirical Analysis
839 F.2d 1525 · 1988
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2009
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Hewitt v. Helms · Sims v. Adams · Robert P. Sheley v. Richard L. Dugger, Robert A. Butterworth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“persuaded that the repeated use of explicit mandatory language in connection with requiring specific substantive predicates demands a conclusion that the State has created a protected liberty interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“requiring that certain procedures `shall,' `will,' or `must' be employed ... and that administrative segregation ... not occur absent specified substantive predicates.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“rules and regulations concerning administrative segregation and close management create for inmates a liberty interest in remaining in the general prison population”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bundy v. Dugger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.