Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 839 F.2d 1572 - Allied-General Nuclear Services v. United States

Allied-General Nuclear Services v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

839 F.2d 1572 · 1988

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
2
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably Holley v. United States (1997), Atlas Corp. v. United States (1990)

5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

29019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 1498 · 42 U.S.C. § 2133 (Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009) · 42 U.S.C. § 4321 (§ 2 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969)

Relies on Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon · First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles · Mugler v. State of Kansas State of Kansas Tufts · Nollan v. California Coastal Commission · Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * that the claimant had no legally protected property right to operate the plant, which could have been the subject of a Fifth Amendment taking, as against the fear that it would injure the national security * * *.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “as against reasonable state regulation, no one has a legally protected right to use property in a manner that is injurious to the safety of the general public.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The exhaustion requirement is not, strictly speaking, a matter of jurisdiction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.