Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 839 F.2d 598 - United States v. Daly

United States v. Daly’s Empirical Analysis

839 F.2d 598 · 1988

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
3
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently May 2014 · most notably United States v. Laughlin (1991), United States v. Williams (1994)

31 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

3101988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2315 · 18 U.S.C. § 3565 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Porzig v. Nolden · Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad · Affronti v. United States · United States v. Redd · United States v. Daly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A decision to revoke probation in no way interferes with the executive parole or clemency power.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “defendant violates a condition of probation at any time prior to the expiration or termination of the term of probation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “applies as readily while [the defendant] serves the jail portion of his sentence as while he is at liberty”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.