Kowitz v. Trinity Health’s Empirical Analysis
839 F.3d 742 · 2016
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from North Dakota District Court)
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Taylor v. Phoenixville School District · Fjellestad v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc. · Fenney v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad · Duty v. Norton-Alcoa Proppants · Kratzer v. Rockwell Collins, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“provide the employer with enough information that, under the circumstances, the employer can be fairly said to know of both the disability and desire for an accommodation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“make it clear to the employer that the employee wants assistance for his or her disability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.