Murillo-Robles v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
839 F.3d 88 · 2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Perez v. Mukasey · Henry v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Herbert v. Ashcroft · Mark Saakian v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · White v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“attaching weight to a factor that d[id] not appropriately bear on the decision”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“But when the BIA embraces the decision of the IJ, 'merely add[ing] its gloss to the IJ's findings and conclusions, - 7 - we treat the two decisions as one.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.