Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 839 FSUPP 1157 - Schreiber v. Kellogg

Schreiber v. Kellogg’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
October 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2013

2 federal appellate · 6 district ·

100199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1963

Relies on Poplar Grove Planting & Refining Co. v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc. · Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Ass'n · 368 F. Supp. 501 - C. Albert Sauter Co., Inc. v. Richard S. Sauter Co., Inc. · Dillon v. City of Chicago · Lightfoot v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a party may obtain a stay of a judgment by posting a supersedeas bond____the court possesses the power to waive the requirement of a supersedeas bond. That power, however, has been exercised only in “extraordinary circumstances,” and only where alternative means of securing the judgment creditor’s interest were available. * * * * H: * In no case has a court approved security different from a full supersedeas bond without a specific showing of good cause by the party seeking the stay. It is the appellant’s burden to demonstrate objectively that posting a full bond is impossible or impracticable; likewise, it is the appellant’s duty to propose a plan that will provide adequate (or as adequate as possible) security for the appellee.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.