839 F. Supp. 80 - Palumbo v. Roberti’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1821
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill · Mesnick v. General Electric Co. · Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc. · Withrow v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the disjointed logic of FIRREA, this notice deficiency does not excuse plaintiffs’ failure to file a timely claim. The statute provides in no uncertain terms that ’claims filed after the date specified in the [published] notice... shall be disallowed and such disallowance shall be final.’ 12 U.S.C. §1821 (d) (5) (C) (i). The sole exception to this finality provision applies only if ’the claimant did not receive notice of the appointment of the receiver in time to file [a] claim before [the deadline]. 3”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.