Santiago v. Keyes’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Quern v. Jordan · Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga. · Regents of University of California v. Doe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to the 'context of state-law claims, in respect to which the State has explicitly waived immunity from state-court proceedings'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Canales v. Gatzunis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.