Lambert v. Lambert’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ohler v. Ohler · Wills v. Jones · 378 Pa. Super. 613 - Leasure v. Leasure · Thompson v. Thompson · 152 Wis. 2d 1 - Parker v. Parker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“discourage a parent from taking a lower paying job to avoid the payment of significant support.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“cireumstances in which a parent is unemployed or underemployed for a legitimate purpose other than avoiding child support and in those cireumstances, there are no grounds for imputing income.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“employment potential and probable earnings level based on the obligor's work history, occupational qualifications, prevailing job opportunities, and earnings levels in the community.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. Sugden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.