Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 839 P.2d 291 - State v. Allen

State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably State v. Thurman (1993), Jensen v. IHC Hospitals, Inc. (2003)

48 state decisions

2101992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Edwards v. Arizona · Brown v. Illinois · Lego v. Twomey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the face of a challenge to the voluntariness of a statement or confession, it is incumbent upon the prosecution to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the statement was made voluntarily based upon the totality of the cireumstances.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A defendant is entitled to a bill of particulars ‘only when the information or-indictment is constitutionally deficient by reason of its failure to inform of the nature and cause of the offense charged/”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “' to support [that] finding ... must reveal some physical or psychological foree or manipulation that is designed to induce the accused to talk when he otherwise would not have done so.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.