Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 839 SO2D 141 - Miceli v. Riso

Miceli v. Riso’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Arceneaux v. Domingue · 283 So. 2d 734 - Coe Oil Service, Inc. v. Hair · 466 So. 2d 631 - Arrow Fence Co. v. DeFrancesch · Arrow Fence Co., Inc. v. DeFrancesch · 391 So. 2d 1170 - Harper v. Brown & Root, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A deposit is an act by which a person receives the property of another, binding himself to preserve it and return it in kind. La. C.C. art. 2926. A voluntary deposit takes place by the mutual consent of the person making the deposit and the person receiving it. La. C.C. art. 2932. Consent is implied when the owner has carried or sent the thing to the depositary, and the latter knowing that the thing had been sent, has not refused to receive it. La. C.C. art. 2933. “However, for the delivery of the object to another to constitute a deposit, there must also be mutual intent, expressed or implied, ... that by the act of accepting it the person who receives it has bound himself to safeguard it. Article 2926.” Coe Oil Service, Inc. v. Hair, 283 So.2d 734, 738 (La.1973).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.