Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 839 So. 2d 770 - Wheeler v. State

839 So. 2d 770 - Wheeler v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · 117 Wash. 2d 369 - State v. DeWeese · Meeks v. Craven · United States v. Stubbs · United States v. Merchant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] criminal defendant who is competent to choose self-representation may not be denied that choice, even though the decision for self-representation will most certainly result in incompetent trial counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]here are no `magic words' in a Faretta inquiry. Rather, we look to the defendant's general understanding of h[is] rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.